ELISA and western blot are two immunoassay techniques that use antibody-antigen interactions to measure the presence and concentration of proteins in samples. While both methods can be useful in biochemical applications, they have distinct advantages for different uses. This article will explore the differences between elisa test vs western blot, so you can choose which one is best for your application.

ELISA, short for enzyme-linked elisa test vs western blot assay, is a widely used method for detecting antibodies and antigens, such as hormones, glycoproteins, proteins, nucleic acids, and other biological molecules. The ELISA process involves coating a plate with antibodies or antigen, blocking the plate with bovine serum albumin (BSA), adding a substrate that produces color upon binding to the antibody or antigen, and reading the results.

Custom Monoclonal Antibody Production Services: Tailored Solutions for Your Project

The ELISA process is faster and easier to perform than the western blot technique, making it an ideal choice for high-throughput labs or if you need a simple test for a specific protein. However, a major disadvantage of ELISA is that one antibody can target only a single protein, and so multiplexing is difficult.

The western blot (WB) is a powerful method for visualizing and confirming protein presence, location, and molecular weight, and for monitoring changes in the expression levels of proteins within cells, tissues, or body fluids. It is also highly flexible, and can be used with a variety of sample types, such as cell lysates, tissue extracts, blood, and other bodily fluids. In the WB technique, proteins are separated by gel electrophoresis, then transferred to a nitrocellulose strip and incubated with an antibody that recognizes a specific region of the protein.